glindley2 at msn.com
Sat Mar 4 04:25:24 CET 2006
Was just about to respond to this thread. Yes, the new kernel works and I am up and booted on it now. Thanks all for pointing out the problem and fix!
----- Original Message -----
From: Max Waterman<mailto:davidmaxwaterman+atrpms-users at fastmail.co.uk>
To: ATrpms user list<mailto:atrpms-users at atrpms.net>
Sent: Friday, March 03, 2006 5:18 PM
Subject: Re: [ATrpms-users] 2.6.15-1.1831_FC4
Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 03, 2006 at 10:38:48PM +0800, Max Waterman wrote:
>> Axel Thimm wrote:
>>> On Thu, Mar 02, 2006 at 10:25:15PM +0800, Max Waterman wrote:
>>>> How can I use a serial connection to capture the messages?
>>> I think this is the right doc:
>> Ug. I have to recompile the kernel. Think I'll not bother with that. A
>> video camera would be much more convenient.
>> I can't imagine why they don't compile this support in by default, so we
>> don't have to have a graphics card :|; but that's another thread, I guess.
> There's a new kernel w/o the smp vs up mismatch for x86_64, have you
> tried this one?
Ah, i just saw 'smart' download it, and was going to ask.
I actually don't have much direct access to the affected computer, so
it'd be useful to hear from the other guy who was seeing this problem
(assuming he has better access to his computer)...
If I try it and it doesn't work, I'm forced to make a trip to the
computer to fix it...unless there's a good way of reverting to an older
OS if booting a new one doesn't work....?
atrpms-users mailing list
atrpms-users at atrpms.net<mailto:atrpms-users at atrpms.net>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the atrpms-users