[ATrpms-users] FC4 to FC5 and lame
Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net
Thu Jun 1 12:47:00 CEST 2006
On Thu, Jun 01, 2006 at 05:53:04AM -0400, Jay Cornell wrote:
> Hello. I have never posted to this group before, so I hope the
> questions are on topic. I have been using the repository for about two
> years -- thank you -- this is really good stuff...
> I have two systems: one with FC4 (amd sempron 2200) and the other is FC5
> (amd 64 sempron 2800). When I installed lame, it would not encode on
> the FC5 system without issuing the --noasm 3dnow option.
grep 3dnow /proc/cpuinfo
say on both systems?
> I was wondering if you could explain how the packages are compiled
> --or where i can go to see for myself-- and whether the FC4 package
> is compiled differently from the FC5 version. Since 3dnow is
> supported by both processors, I decided to start tracing the
> compiles first.
They use the same specfile, e.g. go to the bottom of
I guess this has to do with the hardware or the kernel used on FC4 vs
FC5. BTW see also a similar bug report on
(In short: lame does the 3dnow check at runtime, but it fails)
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20060601/a2fa86bb/attachment.bin
More information about the atrpms-users