[ATrpms-users] Conflict Between ATrpms and KDE for Redhat on FC6

[Rex Dieter]

Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:17:13AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>> Axel Thimm wrote:
>>> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 10:26:11PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
>>>> I thought we had a deal:
>>>> I'd (temporary) drop the mostly optional
>>>> Requires: pinentry-qt/pinentry-gui
>>>> and you'd add the missing subpkgs and/or Provides to be compatible with
>>>> Extras. (:
>>> Looking at the spec file and the list archives it looks like it was
>>> qt/gtk, not qt/gui, and I had added the compatibility hooks back
>>> then. Did gtk get renamed to gui?
>>>
>>> What do you want me to add to the specfile?
>> Extras pinentry, for both -qt and -gtk subpackages, include:
>> Provides: %{name}-gui = %{version}-%{release}
>> It's this Provides that is most likely missing.
>>
>> When I resurrected the pinentry dep, I used pinentry-gui so users could 
>> choose which implementation they preferred.  I had ASSumed this wouldn't 
>> cause any new problems.  Sorry. ):
> 
> OK, no problem, I'll fix it. Rex, how about upping your specfile's
> release to 14 (in extras) and I decomission this package for FC6
> upwards? 

Gosh, I forgot, *I* am pinentry maintainer in Extras (I inherited it 
awhile back...).  Sure, sounds like a plan.

-- Rex