[ATrpms-users] Conflict Between ATrpms and KDE for Redhat on FC6

[Axel Thimm]

On Mon, Dec 04, 2006 at 07:17:13AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 10:26:11PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> 
> >> I thought we had a deal:
> >> I'd (temporary) drop the mostly optional
> >> Requires: pinentry-qt/pinentry-gui
> >> and you'd add the missing subpkgs and/or Provides to be compatible with
> >> Extras. (:
> > 
> > Looking at the spec file and the list archives it looks like it was
> > qt/gtk, not qt/gui, and I had added the compatibility hooks back
> > then. Did gtk get renamed to gui?
> > 
> > What do you want me to add to the specfile?
> 
> Extras pinentry, for both -qt and -gtk subpackages, include:
> Provides: %{name}-gui = %{version}-%{release}
> It's this Provides that is most likely missing.
> 
> When I resurrected the pinentry dep, I used pinentry-gui so users could 
> choose which implementation they preferred.  I had ASSumed this wouldn't 
> cause any new problems.  Sorry. ):

OK, no problem, I'll fix it. Rex, how about upping your specfile's
release to 14 (in extras) and I decomission this package for FC6
upwards? I would only keep it for older FCs and RHEL releases (or if
you bump for older FCs, too, I'll decomission it there, too). Deal?

(we could do similar for other gpg related packages, I think most or
all are under your umbrella in extras, right? But let's do that after
the xmas break, I'm under quite some time pressure this month)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20061204/5d5f9339/attachment.bin