[ATrpms-users] Conflict Between ATrpms and KDE for Redhat on FC6

[Rex Dieter]

Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 10:26:11PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:

>> I thought we had a deal:
>> I'd (temporary) drop the mostly optional
>> Requires: pinentry-qt/pinentry-gui
>> and you'd add the missing subpkgs and/or Provides to be compatible with
>> Extras. (:
> 
> Looking at the spec file and the list archives it looks like it was
> qt/gtk, not qt/gui, and I had added the compatibility hooks back
> then. Did gtk get renamed to gui?
> 
> What do you want me to add to the specfile?

Extras pinentry, for both -qt and -gtk subpackages, include:
Provides: %{name}-gui = %{version}-%{release}
It's this Provides that is most likely missing.

When I resurrected the pinentry dep, I used pinentry-gui so users could 
choose which implementation they preferred.  I had ASSumed this wouldn't 
cause any new problems.  Sorry. ):

-- Rex