[ATrpms-users] Conflict Between ATrpms and KDE for Redhat on FC6

[Axel Thimm]

On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 10:26:11PM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 11:37:14AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> 
> >> This seems more an incompatibility with Fedora Extras pinentry (which
> >> includes a pinentry-qt subpkg).  I take it ATrpms' version does not?
> ...
> >> To clarify, kde-redhat's kdepim includes:
> >> Requires(hint): pinentry-gui
> >> so that one can use either pinentry-qt or pinentry-gtk, since these both
> >>  (from Extras' anway):
> >> Provides: pinentry-gui
> 
> > I remember there was a pinentry issue between kde-redhat and ATrpms
> > two years ago, didn't we fix it back then? How did it resurface again?
> > Or is this something new?
> 
> I thought we had a deal:
> I'd (temporary) drop the mostly optional
> Requires: pinentry-qt/pinentry-gui
> and you'd add the missing subpkgs and/or Provides to be compatible with
> Extras. (:

Looking at the spec file and the list archives it looks like it was
qt/gtk, not qt/gui, and I had added the compatibility hooks back
then. Did gtk get renamed to gui?

What do you want me to add to the specfile?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20061204/ddafc904/attachment.bin