[ATrpms-users] Conflict Between ATrpms and KDE for Redhat on FC6
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Sun Dec 3 18:59:02 CET 2006
On Sun, Dec 03, 2006 at 11:37:14AM -0600, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Rex Dieter wrote:
> > John Welch wrote:
> >> I'm running a FC6 system with many of the typical 3rd party repo's:
> >> ATrpms, Freshrpms, Dag, Dries, and KDE for Redhat.
> ...
> >> Recently when I ran a 'yum check-update' command it showed that, amongst
> >> other packages, kdepim had an update (version 3.5.5-0.3) available from
> >> the KDE for Redhat repo. However when I ran 'yum update' it failed. It
> >> showed that in order to do this update I needed pinentry-qt version
> >> 0.7.2-3. However this package had a dependency of pinentry version
> >> 0.7.2-3. Currently I have pinentry version 0.7.2-12 from the ATrpms
> >> repo.
> >
> > This seems more an incompatibility with Fedora Extras pinentry (which
> > includes a pinentry-qt subpkg). I take it ATrpms' version does not?
I remember there was a pinentry issue between kde-redhat and ATrpms
two years ago, didn't we fix it back then? How did it resurface again?
Or is this something new?
> To clarify, kde-redhat's kdepim includes:
> Requires(hint): pinentry-gui
> so that one can use either pinentry-qt or pinentry-gtk, since these both
> (from Extras' anway):
> Provides: pinentry-gui
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20061203/0d973790/attachment.bin
More information about the atrpms-users
mailing list