[ATrpms-users] invalid SHA ?

Axel Thimm Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Fri Aug 25 20:56:19 CEST 2006


On Fri, Aug 25, 2006 at 08:37:52PM +0200, Marcel Janssen wrote:
> I've got the following issue when upgrading using smart :
> 
> Failed to download packages:
>     
> http://dl.atrpms.net/fc5-x86_64/redhat/updates/system-config-printer-0.6.151.8-1.x86_64.rpm: 
> Invalid SHA (expected 933bcf5775f99b25181e3540928eae28da95023f, got 
> 9ac47e284e7829ac84a2fb03161161cc929b4820)

Please ask Red Hat. To give some background, there were two files with
the same name in the same repo, but with different contents.

File 1
file date: Mon Aug 14 15:02:37 CEST 2006
md5sum	   636933259a3224a8ed2cc42cc89a22ad761f81f6
sha1sum	   933bcf5775f99b25181e3540928eae28da95023f

File 2
file date: Mon Aug 21 18:52:28 CEST 2006
md5sum	   3f666e448d907a556762c69bb24207c4
sha1sum	   9ac47e284e7829ac84a2fb03161161cc929b4820

The first file was replaced today by the second with exactly the same
name which breaks the metadata. Please report to bugzilla.redhat.com.

I assume this is because the original file had the wrong signature and
some dayslater the pakcager found out and pushed the proper package to
the repo.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20060825/4cee55cc/attachment.bin 


More information about the atrpms-users mailing list