[ATrpms-users] 3w-9xxx kernel modules RPMs missing
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Aug 8 18:16:37 CEST 2006
On Tue, Aug 08, 2006 at 09:29:28AM -0400, Tuan Hoang wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> > On Thu, Aug 03, 2006 at 07:42:50PM -0400, Tuan Hoang wrote:
> >> First off, thanks for updating the 3ware driver to 9.3.0.4.
> >>
> >> Secondly, all the kernel module RPM's under Fedora Core 3 seem to be
> >> missing. Also from looking at the download server's & a mirror's
> >> directories, it looks like the RPM's are missing.
> >
> > By missing you mean not updated as done for most other releases?
> > That's because for 2.6 kernels it now depends on linux/mutex.h and
> > therefore does not build anymore on FC3, FC2 and EL4.
> >
> > If you like you can report upstream and maybe they'll fix it in
> > the next release or offer some patch.
>
> Axel,
>
> Is there a reason why you need to use the "upstream_kernels" source
> versus the "supp_distros" source for distributions with older kernels?
> The latter seems to compile fine under FC3 and assumingly RHEL4 since it
> is very similar.
Let me ask a counter-question: :=)
Is there a reason for two source distributions for supported vs
upstream kernels?
The release process of 3w-9xxx seems a bit messy like the
upstream_kernels tarball containing another tarball inside with
exactly the same sources again. Looks like a matrushka self-backuping
tarball :)
I'll see what I can do.
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20060808/05483454/attachment.bin
More information about the atrpms-users
mailing list