[ATrpms-users] FC5 kernel

[Warren Melnick]

2069_FC4 got installed.  You were right, my yum repos in some cases were
still pointing to fc4, although /etc/issie (and /etc/redhat-release) were
showing FC5. Upgrading (again) now.  I guess I should have caught up on my
sleep first :)

Thanks for the help!
Warren

On 4/6/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
>
> On Thu, Apr 06, 2006 at 10:29:53AM -0400, Warren Melnick wrote:
> > I used yum and everything seems to have loaded properly for fc5, except
> that
> > there are some signs that it was not 100%.  How do I check which version
> the
> > system thinks it is?
>
> /etc/issue
>
> But you still didn't say, which kernel was installed. You must have
> stale yum config entries that still point to FC4 repos instead of FC5
> ones. Update atrpms-package-config (and medley-packaage-config if
> installed) before proceeding with updating.
>
> > W
> >
> > On 4/5/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> > >
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > On Wed, Apr 05, 2006 at 08:44:30AM -0400, Warren wrote:
> > > > Hi Axel,
> > > >
> > > > I upgraded my laptop to FC5 last night from FC4 with your repository
> as
> > > > well as dag and dries turned on.  The resulting new kernel seems to
> have
> > > > a FC4 suffix instead of an FC5 suffix.  I had to make a softlink for
> > > > some packages to install correctly (madwifi specifically).  Is this
> a
> > > > known problem?
> > >
> > > No, what did sou use to upgrade? smart/yum/apt? What kernel was
> > > installed? If this has an fc4 suffix, then your depsolver was looking
> > > at the fc4 repo instead of the fc5 one.
> > >
> > > > Thanks,
> > > > Warren
> > >
> > >
> > >
> > >
>
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20060406/42d4d6f9/attachment-0001.html