[ATrpms-users] Re: ntfs + software suspend

[Alexander Bergolth]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA1

On 10/03/2005 06:36 PM, Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sun, Oct 02, 2005 at 11:57:47AM +0200, Alexander Bergolth wrote:
>>On 09/29/05 20:21, Matthias Hensler wrote:
>>>On Thu, Sep 29, 2005 at 07:41:40PM +0200, Axel Thimm wrote:
>>>>[...]
>>>>
>>>>>What I can do, is to rebuild the packages from ATrpms for my kernel
>>>>>versions (at least for i686-up) and either provide them on my page,
>>>>>or directly at ATrpms, whatever the best solution here is.
>>>>
>>>>Best thing would be at ATrpms, and even by the buildsystem there.
>>>
>>>Yes, good to hear, that would save me lots of CPU time and the need of
>>>an own buildsystem.
>>
>>Do you think it would make sense to combine the suspend2 and 
>>reenable-8k-kernel-stack-for-xfs patches? (See 
>>http://bugzilla.atrpms.net/show_bug.cgi?id=618 for details about the 8k 
>>issue.)
> 
> I guess that would be Matthias' decision, but I would welcome
> it. AFAIK only the 8k/4k mixed stack patch needs to go into the
> kernel, and xfs will be built externally, right?

Right.
The patch changes only a few lines. (It disables CONFIG_4KSTACKS and
adds a CONFIG_IRQSTACKS option.)

XFS is still enabled as a module, as it is in Fedora's original kernel.

Cheers,
- --leo
- --
- -----------------------------------------------------------------------
Alexander.Bergolth at wu-wien.ac.at                Fax: +43-1-31336-906050
Zentrum fuer Informatikdienste - Wirtschaftsuniversitaet Wien - Austria

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v1.2.6 (GNU/Linux)
Comment: Using GnuPG with Fedora - http://enigmail.mozdev.org

iD8DBQFDQl2esYaksEkoAQMRAqTpAJ9GNPZr/yhl6iv+qpzeCMjl69QqdQCgkAHx
mbWQYcbuFCmaf+7y79/nCCw=
=Yltb
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----