[ATrpms-users] Re: mplayer win32codecs or firefox flash plugin on x86_64?

[Axel Thimm]

On Sun, Nov 06, 2005 at 12:40:35AM +0100, Tako Schotanus wrote:
> >No, that's because apt does not work on multilibed systems, or placed
> >differently it cannot cope with packages for different architetcures
> >having the same name, like the two glibc packages for i386 and x86_64.

> But others can?

Yes.

> I saw example on other distros where you can specify for which
> architecture you want to install a package but how do you do that
> for yum/smart?

smart install foo at x86_64
yum install foo.x86_64

> Or will that only work for manually installed rpms?
> 
> Anyway, maybe I'll try again in the future but now I'm happily playing 
> WoW again and that's more important ;-)

If you do attack this again and create some HOWTO then please consider
submitting as ATrpms' docu. Thanks!
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20051106/77faa0a3/attachment.bin