[ATrpms-users] Re: XFS support for EL4 and clones

[Axel Thimm]

On Tue, May 31, 2005 at 07:13:27AM -0400, Wayne Steenburg wrote:
> 
> > XFS can also be packaged as separate modules, but that requires quite
> > a bit of effort and is best discussed on the xfs list.
> > 
> > Adding support for any enhanched Centos kernel would certainly also be
> > an option.
> 
> Would packaging XFS as a separate module be the preferred route, while
> adding support for the centosplus kernel be the easiest?

Yes. :)

> I'm not sure if I should bring this up on the XFS list

Already done, but please back up the query. The more visible the
demand is, the more likely it is that SGI will check that the out of
the tree builds work.

> or ask nicely for centosplus kmdls :)

I think you already did. ;)

Where can I read more about centosplus in general (goals etc.) and its
kernel diffs in particular? Did they remove 4KSTACKS for adding XFS?

I can't promise anything in any timely fashion, FC4 is just around the
corner and there will be more demand on this. Also RHEL support at
ATrpms is uncomplete w/o a mirror of a clone, so this also needs to be
taken care of ... :/
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20050531/75f68528/attachment.bin