[ATrpms-users] Re: Cannot apt-get freetype-devel; installed version is newer (I think)

[Axel Thimm]

On Fri, Feb 04, 2005 at 07:20:18PM -0600, Mark Prinz wrote:
> Sorry for the top post...I had my settings set to 'digest' and could
> not see the response.
> 
> Wayne, thanks for the response.  I thought that as well, however, I
> receive the following error when trying to launch mythfronend, which
> led me to believe I needed something else on my machine (FWIW,
> libmythstream.so does exist in the correct directory):
> 
> /usr/lib/mythtv/plugins/libmythstream.so: undefined symbol:
> _ZN9QGroupBox10setEnabledEb
> Unable to initialize plugin 'mythstream'.

MythTV's dependencies on qt are rather high these days. So there is a
qt in bleeding that is needed to run MythTV with on older systems.

> Thanks for the assistance.
> 
> On Fri, 2005-02-04 at 18:30 -0600, Mark Prinz wrote:
> > I am trying to add MythStream to my Myth setup (FC1, 0.16). While I
> > used the RPM version from ATrpms, since this is a plugin, I also
> > downloaded (but did not install) the version from
> > http://home.kabelfoon.nl/~moongies/streamtuned.html.
> > 
> > While reviewing the installation instructions, I noticed that it
> > required qt-devel and xfree86-devel. qt-devel installed fine (via
> > apt), however, I went into a dependency spiral with xfree86-devel that
> > ultimately required freetype-devel. When I tried to install
> > freetype-devel, it said that it required freetype-2.1.4-5. I checked
> > mine, and I have freetype-2.1.7-3.99_1.rhfc1.at (which I assume is a
> > newer version).
> > 
> > Any ideas on what I can do to push forward?  I really want to get
> > MythStream setup.
> > 
> > Thanks!
> > 
> The development pacakages are only necessary to compile the source
> yourself.  If you downloaded and manually installed the binary rpm or
> used apt-get any dependencies are either automagically installed (apt)
> or it will bail out with an error (rpm).  Have you tried using it yet
> (mythstream)? Unless I'm misunderstanding you, I think you're making
> things more difficult than they have to be.  
> 
> Wayne Steenburg
> 
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-users mailing list
> atrpms-users at atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-users

-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20050205/dfa82f75/attachment-0001.bin