[ATrpms-users] Re: Conflict between kdesdk-3.4.2-0.fc4.1 and
Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net
Tue Aug 16 13:17:02 CEST 2005
On Tue, Aug 16, 2005 at 12:43:16AM -0500, Wagz wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> >Quite strange, two different depsolvers with the same bug? :/
> >Anyway blast away both packages with rpm -e --nodeps and use smart fix
> >or apt-get -f install to fill in the holes again. If you get the same
> >errors, then we are looking at different packages called
> >kdelibs-3.4.2-0.fc4.1 and kdesdk-3.4.2-0.fc4.1, as these files don't
> >exist in kdesdk-3.4.2-0.fc4.1.
> Just got bit with this two nights a go during a dist-upgrade. Just tried
> smart for the first time, same behavior as George had.
> Should I also remove the offending packages and reinstall -f as was
> suggested to George or has additional insight into this situation arisen
> since then?
Yes, see Rex's answer below. Probably the easiest/fastest is to
uninstall (rpm -e --nodeps) and reinstall (apt-get -f install or smart
> Also noticed this during an apt-get update:
> Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat/updates pkglist
> Hit http://dl.atrpms.net fc3-i386/redhat/updates release
> Failed to fetch http://dl.atrpms.net/fc3-i386/base/pkglist.at-stable
> 404 Not Found
> Reading Package Lists... Done
> Should I edit sources.list to include the /atrpms and or /redhat before
Yes, and remove the "at-". How did you get that config?
On Mon, Aug 01, 2005 at 08:34:51AM -0500, Rex Dieter wrote:
> Axel Thimm wrote:
> >On Sun, Jul 31, 2005 at 03:12:29PM -0400, George Galt wrote:
> >>rpm -q kdesdk kdelibs returns:
> >>and rpm -qf /usr/share/doc/HTML/en/cervisia/common/1.png returns:
> >OK, looks like kde-redhat had packaged these files in kdelibs and the
> >Red Hat updates package these into kdesdk.
> No, it's a I'm going to try to "replace a directory with a symlink and
> fail" packaging error.
> Well, since redhat pushed kde-3.4.2 to (stable) updates so quickly, I
> guess kde-redhat will have to follow suit (it was in testing). AFAIK,
> upgrading to/from kde-redhat packages don't have this bug.
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20050816/1e480a6c/attachment.bin
More information about the atrpms-users