[ATrpms-users] Re: mythtv-suite missing?

[Axel Thimm]

On Wed, Apr 06, 2005 at 11:32:18PM -0700, Jarod Wilson wrote:
> On Wednesday 06 April 2005 21:49, GREG & AMY LINDLEY wrote:
> > Thanks.  I should be more clear, but yum failure was simply to demonstrate
> > that this is just not an apt-get problem.  I prefer to use apt-get if
> > possible.
> >
> > Here is some more information.  When I point to the i386 repositories, I
> > get the following from 'apt-get install mythtv-suite':
> >
> > The following packages have unmet dependencies:
> >   mythtv-suite: Depends: mythtv-backend (>= 0.17) but it is not going to be
> > installed
> >                 Depends: mythtv-frontend (>= 0.17) but it is not going to
> > be installed
> >
> > etc...
> >
> > So, I can see the mythtv-suite target in the i386 package list.  When I
> > change the sources.list file and simply replace i386 with x86_64, I get
> > (yes, I did an 'apt-get update' before running this):
> >
> > # apt-get install mythtv-suite
> > Reading Package Lists... Done
> > Building Dependency Tree... Done
> > E: Couldn't find package mythtv-suite
> >
> > So, I think the new pkglist file for x86_64 is broke.
> 
> apt is broken as all get-out on multiarch systems, never use it on an x86_64 
> box that also has i386 packages (see bugzilla.atrpms.net for more details). 
> Why yum isn't working, I don't know. My only x86_64 box is running RHEL4, so 
> no full ATrpms repo to test against (yet).

I also assumed he has multilib at first, but he already unmultilibed
his system, so apt should work (ATrpms' main server i x86_64
unmultilibed held at updates with apt, so it definitely works ;)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20050407/9f04dac0/attachment.bin