[ATrpms-users] Re: problems with signatures of rpms
Mardin01 at gmx.de
Mon Apr 5 22:17:29 CEST 2004
Thanks for your help ... I not so familar with GPG at the moment ... :-( ..
maybe in very near future because I thinks it's really useful :-)
What about your signature ... how to get your public key ?
Am Donnerstag, 1. April 2004 09:59 schrieb Axel Thimm:
> On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:37:33PM +0200, Mardin wrote:
> > Hi everybody :-)
> > Trying to upgrade my system SuSE 9 with apt gives me following errors ...
> > any idea what to do?
> There are not too many SuSE users on the list, I assume, but hopefully
> the answer applies as well.
> > Checking GPG signatures...
> > Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/lua_5.0.2-rb1_i586.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> > Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/apt-libs_0.5.15cnc6-rb1_i586.rpm: sha1
> > md5 OK Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_0.5.15cnc6-rb1_i586.rpm: sha1
> > md5 OK Unsigned
> > /var/cache/apt/archives/hicolor-icon-theme_0.4-100.SuSE.ulb.1_i586.rpm:
> > sha1 md5 OK
> > Unsigned
> > /var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-icon-theme_1.2.0-100.SuSE.ulb.1_i586.rpm:
> > sha1 md5 OK
> > Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/k3b_0.11.9-0.pm.1_i586.rpm:
> > (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#cd3140cd)
> > Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/kdetv_0.8rc1-0.pm.0_i586.rpm:
> > (SHA1) DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#1be4d89e)
> > E: Error(s) while checking package signatures:
> > 5 unsigned package(s)
> > 2 package(s) with unknown signatures
> Well, as said above, you have 5 packages unsigned and two signed with
> keys #cd3140cd and #1be4d89e, which you haven't imported in, yet.
> The keys belong to Rainer Lay <rainer.lay at informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
> and Herbert Graeber <herbert at links2linux.de>, maybe that can help you
More information about the atrpms-users