[ATrpms-users] Re: problems with signatures of rpms

[Axel Thimm]

On Tue, Mar 30, 2004 at 04:37:33PM +0200, Mardin wrote:
> Hi everybody :-)
> 
> Trying to upgrade my system SuSE 9 with apt gives me following errors ... any 
> idea what to do?

There are not too many SuSE users on the list, I assume, but hopefully
the answer applies as well.

> Checking GPG signatures...
> Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/lua_5.0.2-rb1_i586.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/apt-libs_0.5.15cnc6-rb1_i586.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/apt_0.5.15cnc6-rb1_i586.rpm: sha1 md5 OK
> Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/hicolor-icon-theme_0.4-100.SuSE.ulb.1_i586.rpm: 
> sha1 md5 OK
> Unsigned /var/cache/apt/archives/gnome-icon-theme_1.2.0-100.SuSE.ulb.1_i586.rpm: 
> sha1 md5 OK
> Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/k3b_0.11.9-0.pm.1_i586.rpm: (SHA1) 
> DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#cd3140cd)
> Unknown signature /var/cache/apt/archives/kdetv_0.8rc1-0.pm.0_i586.rpm: (SHA1) 
> DSA sha1 md5 (GPG) NOT OK (MISSING KEYS: GPG#1be4d89e)
> E: Error(s) while checking package signatures:
> 5 unsigned package(s)
> 2 package(s) with unknown signatures

Well, as said above, you have 5 packages unsigned and two signed with
keys #cd3140cd and #1be4d89e, which you haven't imported in, yet.

The keys belong to Rainer Lay <rainer.lay at informatik.uni-erlangen.de>
and Herbert Graeber <herbert at links2linux.de>, maybe that can help you
further.
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-users/attachments/20040401/97d59a04/attachment.bin