[ATrpms-devel] Final remarks about RHEL6
promac at gmail.com
Fri Feb 25 12:45:29 CET 2011
On Thu, Feb 24, 2011 at 8:16 PM, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> On Fri, 2011-02-11 at 09:22 -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> > I think we have now a minimum set of packages to turn rhel6 usable
> > from a desktop point of view.
> > However, I have a question: what is the official qt4 ATrpms version?
> > When I installed avidemux, it had an unresolved symbol because I was
> > using the
> > stock qt 4.6.2. That is, the package installed, but the executable did
> > not run (not very nice..).
> > avidemux: symbol lookup error: avidemux: undefined symbol:
> > _ZN9QListData11detach_growEPii
> > also, see:
> > Well, if qt47 is mandatory, because you seem to be linking everything
> > against it,
> > it can not be on testing. It has to go to stable.
> The repo need to define proper names for the bist used. qt47 will
> probably never make it to what we currently call "stable" as that is
> supposed to not touch upstream packages.
In this specific case, avidemux did not pull qt 47, and this is the problem.
How one would know what to do to satisfy the unresolved reference?
May I suggest a simple work around?
Why not using the green colour this way:
"good packages that have been working very well, but depend on the testing
repo being activated."
The green colour has never been used in ATrpms site before, and it could
inform all of us what packages have been linked
against the testing repo.
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the atrpms-devel