[ATrpms-devel] Final remarks about RHEL6
promac at gmail.com
Fri Feb 11 12:22:50 CET 2011
I think we have now a minimum set of packages to turn rhel6 usable from a
desktop point of view.
However, I have a question: what is the official qt4 ATrpms version?
When I installed avidemux, it had an unresolved symbol because I was using
stock qt 4.6.2. That is, the package installed, but the executable did not
run (not very nice..).
avidemux: symbol lookup error: avidemux: undefined symbol:
Well, if qt47 is mandatory, because you seem to be linking everything
it can not be on testing. It has to go to stable.
The other option is forgetting qt47, and start using qtwebkit, possibly
it as a BR in some specs (e.g., mythtv). The absence of qtwebkit was the
only reason for providing qt47 on rhel6. Qt seems to be compatible top down
only, I mean, it works when having a higher version replacing
a lower version, and not the other way around.
Finally, will we have a rhel6 kernel-tuxonice?
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the atrpms-devel