[ATrpms-devel] dovecot-sieve
Angel Marin
anmar at anmar.eu.org
Mon Jul 23 17:11:55 CEST 2007
Axel Thimm escribió:
> On Mon, Jul 23, 2007 at 02:50:15PM +0200, Angel Marin wrote:
>> Axel Thimm escribió:
>>> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 06:24:32PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
>>>> Axel Thimm wrote:
>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>
>>>>> On Sat, Jul 21, 2007 at 03:46:23PM +0200, Kim Bisgaard wrote:
>>>>>> Hi,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> I wonder if you have a method in your build-system, so that when one
>>>>>> package get rebuild, another does so too, like for the kernel to the
>>>>>> kmdl's.
>>>>>>
>>>>>> If so could you please set it so that when dovecot leads to a rebuild of
>>>>>> dovecot-sieve? (dovecot-sieve depends on a specific version of dovecot)
>>>>> It's a manual decision/procedure. It was said that it should had been
>>>>> neccessary to rebuild dovecot-sieve in 1.0.x, but judging from your
>>>>> mail it seems to have to. Or were you refering to d-s 1.0.2? That's a
>>>>> different story and it is being built and deliveered seperately.
>>>> It was just to minimize the window where dovecot would upgrade, but not
>>>> install, because of d-s dependency on the old package. Same old problem
>>>> as with kernel upgrades not working because new kmdl-packages are not
>>>> yet available.
>>> But the d-s to d dependency is not that strict as the kmdl->kernel.
>> Now that we're approaching dovecot 1.1 release, it might be a good idea
>> to make that dependency more strict (<1.1) just to make sure dovecot 1.1
>> does not get upgraded until dovecot-sieve 1.1 is available.
>
> Will dovecot 1.1 break the ABI to dovecot-sieve?
Can't say for sure, but given the big changes there have been, I bet it
does (I recall Timo saying that current dovecot-sieve wouldn't even
compile with the released alpha, so it may be hint). I'll give it a
deeper look and do some tests later though.
--
Angel Marin
http://anmar.eu.org/
More information about the atrpms-devel
mailing list