promac at gmail.com
Wed Jan 17 14:28:15 CET 2007
On 1/17/07, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> On Tue, Jan 16, 2007 at 10:30:52PM -0200, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> > why libmp3lame.a is gone from the latest lame package?
> do you need it? Fedora/RHEL try to kill *.a and *.la, so I'm just
> trying to blend in.
I am still using lame-devel-3.97-14.fc6.at.i386.rpm,
which has it. That is why I noticed its absence only yesterday.
freshrpms did the same, by the way.
When I was compiling darkice, I noticed that in FC5 lame was not being
detected. Also, twolame and faac were never detected, either in FC5 or FC6.
The problem was that the Makefile was looking for the .a to detect the
of a library. I had to patch it to make it look for the .so instead.
But I do not understand why removing the static version of a library will
help anything. Just to avoid static linking? Isn't it the right course
Paulo Roma Cavalcanti
LCG - UFRJ
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the atrpms-devel