[ATrpms-devel] new gspcav1 driver

[Paulo Cavalcanti]

Hi, Axel

I have rebooted two more times, and no problem at all.

I also tested the last gspca rpm in FC5, and also fine.

lirc is working with the new rules in FC5.

So, two problems less ... back to nvidia ....

By the way, FC6 is perfectly usable now. Just need
to try  MythTV  on it.

/Paulo Roma.

On 10/26/06, Paulo Cavalcanti <promac at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> Hi, Axel
>
> I am using the last version you posted and it is fine.
> The interesting fact is that before I fix the udev rules for lirc
> and fuse, gspca changed my video devs:
>
> gspca became video0 and bttv video1.
>
> Not really a problem, but weird ....
> The problem only appears after the first reboot.
> That is why I did not realize before.
>
> Seems fine now. Everything back to normal.
> But, maybe, I should reboot a few more times to be sure ....
>
> /Paulo Roma.
>
>
> On 10/26/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:18:43PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> > > Hi,
> > >
> > > Axel has rebuilt gspcav1 without v4l, which removes the
> > > need of installing video4linux.
> >
> > Yes, sorry for the first build. I forgot to copy over spca5xx's
> > settings which were --without v4l for FC5 and FC6, so it defaulted to
> > using them.
> >
> > If gspcav1 works fine I'll remove spca5xx for the distributions that
> > carry gspcav1.
> >
> > > Can I close the bug in bugzila now?
> > >
> > > /Paulo Roma.
> > >
> > > On 10/24/06, Paulo Cavalcanti <promac at gmail.com> wrote:
> > > >
> > > >It is part of the kernel. But optionally, we can use newer versions
> > of the
> > > >modules, from the video4linux project, which are going to appear in
> > future
> > > >kernel releases.
> > > >
> > > >Depending on the hardware, an external v4l module may be necessary.
> > > >For gspcav1 it is not.
> > > >
> > > >/Paulo Roma.
> > > >
> > > >
> > > >On 10/24/06, Eric Tanguy <eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr > wrote:
> > > >>
> > > >> v4l is not part of fedora 5 ?
> > > >>
> > > >> Eric
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >> Le mardi 24 octobre 2006 à 14:15 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti a écrit :
> > > >> > For fedora 5 video4linux is not necessary.
> > > >> > It is just a question of rebuilding it without v4l.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > For Fedora 6 I do not know.  I have to look at it closely.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > /Paulo Roma.
> > > >> >
> > > >> > On 10/24/06, Eric Tanguy <eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr> wrote:
> > > >> >         The new gspcav1 driver obsolete spca5xx but i can't
> > understand
> > > >> >         why it
> > > >> >         requires video4linux whereas spca5xx didn't ?
> > > >> >         Thanks
> > > >> >
> > > >> >         Eric
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >
> > > >> >         _______________________________________________
> > > >> >         atrpms-devel mailing list
> > > >> >         atrpms-devel at atrpms.net
> > > >> >         http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
> > > >> >
> > > >>
> > > >>
> > > >
> >
> > > _______________________________________________
> > > atrpms-devel mailing list
> > > atrpms-devel at atrpms.net
> > > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
> >
> > --
> > Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
> >
> >
> >
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/attachments/20061026/e8aac5c1/attachment.html