[ATrpms-devel] new gspcav1 driver

[Paulo Cavalcanti]

Hi, Axel

I am using the last version you posted and it is fine.
The interesting fact is that before I fix the udev rules for lirc
and fuse, gspca changed my video devs:

gspca became video0 and bttv video1.

Not really a problem, but weird ....
The problem only appears after the first reboot.
That is why I did not realize before.

Seems fine now. Everything back to normal.
But, maybe, I should reboot a few more times to be sure ....

/Paulo Roma.


On 10/26/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Oct 25, 2006 at 09:18:43PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Axel has rebuilt gspcav1 without v4l, which removes the
> > need of installing video4linux.
>
> Yes, sorry for the first build. I forgot to copy over spca5xx's
> settings which were --without v4l for FC5 and FC6, so it defaulted to
> using them.
>
> If gspcav1 works fine I'll remove spca5xx for the distributions that
> carry gspcav1.
>
> > Can I close the bug in bugzila now?
> >
> > /Paulo Roma.
> >
> > On 10/24/06, Paulo Cavalcanti <promac at gmail.com> wrote:
> > >
> > >It is part of the kernel. But optionally, we can use newer versions of
> the
> > >modules, from the video4linux project, which are going to appear in
> future
> > >kernel releases.
> > >
> > >Depending on the hardware, an external v4l module may be necessary.
> > >For gspcav1 it is not.
> > >
> > >/Paulo Roma.
> > >
> > >
> > >On 10/24/06, Eric Tanguy <eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr > wrote:
> > >>
> > >> v4l is not part of fedora 5 ?
> > >>
> > >> Eric
> > >>
> > >>
> > >> Le mardi 24 octobre 2006 à 14:15 -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti a écrit :
> > >> > For fedora 5 video4linux is not necessary.
> > >> > It is just a question of rebuilding it without v4l.
> > >> >
> > >> > For Fedora 6 I do not know.  I have to look at it closely.
> > >> >
> > >> > /Paulo Roma.
> > >> >
> > >> > On 10/24/06, Eric Tanguy <eric.tanguy at univ-nantes.fr> wrote:
> > >> >         The new gspcav1 driver obsolete spca5xx but i can't
> understand
> > >> >         why it
> > >> >         requires video4linux whereas spca5xx didn't ?
> > >> >         Thanks
> > >> >
> > >> >         Eric
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >
> > >> >         _______________________________________________
> > >> >         atrpms-devel mailing list
> > >> >         atrpms-devel at atrpms.net
> > >> >         http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
> > >> >
> > >>
> > >>
> > >
>
> > _______________________________________________
> > atrpms-devel mailing list
> > atrpms-devel at atrpms.net
> > http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
>
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/attachments/20061026/6f80b6b3/attachment.html