[ATrpms-devel] suspend2 kernel provides

[Axel Thimm]

On Wed, May 17, 2006 at 10:46:02AM +0200, Alexander Bergolth wrote:
> Concerning openafs, it looks like we have agreed about a feature-check 
> now:

> > Depending on vmlinuz is so much easier and stable, did I mention that?
> > :)
> 
> I don't know the official statement on that topic.

Official? From where, ATrpms, Red Hat, Fedora or OpenAFS? ;)

It's the only thing that works since several years and that will work
for several more. It's even static-kernel safe, what more do you want? :)

> A feature check would help. But yes, for those old distros it seems the 
> best solution to simply not specify any kernel-dependency.

Well, you have a dependency that requires a "feature check" and
another that works w/o. Pick one ;)

Anyway, you do now understand why the openafs' rpm method is broken
and why it isn't kernel-suspend2 that needs fixing, or not? :)

Are you interested in maintaining an openafs kmdl?
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/attachments/20060517/5418dc61/attachment.bin