[ATrpms-devel] yum kmdl plugin

[Tako Schotanus]

Axel Thimm wrote:
> On Sat, Jul 29, 2006 at 05:33:13PM +0200, Tako Schotanus wrote:
>   
>> With all the talk about this yum-plugin I was wondering Axel: is yum 
>> again a viable and trustworthy option for keeping your system up-to-date?
>>
>> I'm asking because for a long time you seemed to consider it one of the 
>> worst. So how does it compare nowadays to apt and smart?
>>     
>
> Hm, let me get my book on "diplomatic answers":
>   
*snip*
> Now, read through the lines :=)
>
>   
Hmm, ok, let's see:
> yum is used by a lot of people that need kmdl support. Whoever hasn't
> Yet heard and/or tested smart (or apt) will probably not be able to
> Understand why kMdls aren't installed automatically. InStead of
> reiterating the argUments and bash 9-liners all over again, I
> preferred to fix this issue.
>
> It also serves as a demostration to the fedora paCkaging group to
> consider accepting Kmdl packaging methods. In fact that was what gave
> me the final puSh.
>
>   
Ah, ok, I understand now ;-)

Sorry, just kidding.

-Tako