[ATrpms-devel] IRC session on #fedora-packaging today on kmdl adoption in Fedora

[Paulo Cavalcanti]

Hi, Axel

Great text about kernel modules!! Very well written!!

I have always thought that kmod belonged to livna and kmdl to atrpms.
No doubt about what is the best solution. However, it is not clear for me
what are the implications for us, ATrpms users, of Fedora's people opinion.

I think that ATrpms with a minimum amount of documentation is unbeatable.
Jarod's  MythTV howto is the proof. I really think that the acceptance of
livna packages are becoming smaller.

Keep up with the good work.

/Paulo Roma.

On 8/18/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> in the past few weeks I have been trying to convince Fedora folks that
> the currently used scheme there ("kmod") is broken and that they
> should switch to the kmdl scheme.
>
> I've written a lot about kmdls and compared them to the kmod scheme
> here:
>
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AxelThimm/kmdls
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AxelThimm/kmdls/kmods_vs_kmdls_at_a_glance
> http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/AxelThimm/kmdls/voting
>
> It's one of the largest and most detailed writeups of kmdls to date,
> so it's definitely a good reading for everyone messing with kmdls :)
>
> If you like to join/watch the session it's at 17:00UTC on
> #fedora-packaging on freenode today. It's a tough item and authors of
> the previous scheme are not pleased for having it suggested to get
> replaced. But I do hope that we'll get somewhere.
>
> --
> Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> atrpms-devel mailing list
> atrpms-devel at atrpms.net
> http://lists.atrpms.net/mailman/listinfo/atrpms-devel
>
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/attachments/20060818/468a312a/attachment.html