[ATrpms-devel] kernel 2.6.17-1.2174_FC5smp

[Paulo Cavalcanti]

Hi, Axel

I am back again. I upgraded the kernel and drivers on two other computers,
and everything worked fine. So, I tried the nvidia driver from atrpms at
home
again, and the same problem - the module did no load, and I had to return to
the driver I compiled myself (identical source and version).

I saved Xorg.0.log from the failed version of the driver, and the
interesting part is below. Why is Mouse0 detected as  type KEYBOARD when I
use ATrpms module? The only difference is that at home I use "evdev" as the
mouse driver, and I have a touch pad on the keyboard (serial mouse), and at
work I do not.

Maybe the problem is a different version of a package at ATrpms. I do no
know.

I have no other clue.

If you have a suggestion .....

Thank you.

/Paulo Roma.

---------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------

(**) Keyboard0: CustomKeycodes disabled
(II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Keyboard0" (type: KEYBOARD)
(II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Serial Mouse" (type: MOUSE)
(II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "Mouse0" (type: KEYBOARD)
(II) XINPUT: Adding extended input device "NVIDIA Event Handler" (type:
Other)

   *** If unresolved symbols were reported above, they might not
   *** be the reason for the server aborting.

Backtrace:
0: /usr/bin/Xorg(xf86SigHandler+0x87) [0x80b8727]
1: [0x234420]
2: /usr/bin/Xorg(NumMotionEvents+0x1e) [0x807e22e]
3: /usr/bin/Xorg(main+0x6af) [0x80703ff]
4: /lib/libc.so.6(__libc_start_main+0xdc) [0xad7724]
5: /usr/bin/Xorg(FontFileCompleteXLFD+0xb1) [0x806f511]

Fatal server error:
Caught signal 11.  Server aborting

-----------------------------------------------------------------------------

On 8/13/06, Paulo Cavalcanti <promac at gmail.com> wrote:
>
>
>
> On 8/13/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
> >
> > On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 06:54:39PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> > > I have just upgraded my kernel. Your new yum plugin downloaded all
> > > the modules and everything has been installed. It is a success, I
> > > checked, and the versions are correct.
> >
> > Thanks!
> >
> > > However, nvidia driver did not load. So, I had to recompile  it and
> > reboot
> > > again.
> >
> > Do you have multiple nvidia driver versions installed? If they get
> > updated there may be a mismatch and you need to use
> > nvidia-graphics-switch.
> >
> > > Maybe you should check nividia driver again:
> > >
> > >
> > nvidia-graphics8762-kmdl-2.6.17-1.2174_FC5smp-1.0_8762-74.fc5.at.i686.rpm
> >
> > The recompilation you did was it on the same src.rpm as the one above?
>
>
> Yes it is. I have just downloaded the source. Although I have multiple
> nvidia drivers, all of them are 8762. This is because I have at least 4
> kernels installed. Just check, please. I may be wrong.
>
> > But why smart for Fedora 5 does not use all the channels? Mine, only
> > > lists atrpms, extras, fedoralegacyupdates, release, rpm-db and
> > > updates.
> >
> > There is no difference in smart/yum wrt channels. If you only install
> > atrpms-package-config you get the above. If you add
> > medley-package-config you get a lot more, but always for both
> > depsolvers (or better said for all three including apt).
> >
> > > On the other hand, fedora 4 lists all of the channels.
> >
> > You probably have medley-package-config for FC4 installed, but not for
> > FC5.
>
>
> No. I have only
>
> medley-package-config-109-3.fc5.at.i386.rpm
>
> This has been this way since I installed FC5. But since I am not an expert
> in smart, I thought I forgot to do any configuration.
>
> I did a clean fedora 5 installation, using redhat CDs, and a brand new
> SATA hd.
> I created the image for the other computers from this installation.
>
> > And second, why does synaptic change the name of the packages?  It
> > > replaces some - for _ in the rpm name.
> >
> > Beats me, can you give an example?
>
>
> Let me see If I remenber. I have a script to fix the names. I thing that
>
> alsaplayer-0.99.76-2.rhfc5.ccrma.i386.rpm
>
> is saved as:
>
> alsaplayer_0.99.76-2.rhfc5.ccrma_i386.rpm. This has always been this way,
> even for older versions. Generally, I used synapitic only for CCRMA. But
> they support yum now.
>
> Fedora is running rosegarden with jack very well. The only problem
> is the kernel .... Not real time ...
>
> But, even band-in-a-box can be used via wine. So, I think the day I will
> dump windows forever is very close. As you can see, I am a frustrated
> musician.
>
>
> > I upgraded yum for fedora 4 to 2.6.1. It works great. I use your plugin,
> > > protectbase, etc...
> > > Do you intend to do the same thing for ATrpms? I am not saying people
> > should
> > > use fedora 4.
> >
> > You mean upgrading yum to 2.6.1?
>
>
> Yes. For fedora 4.
>
> /Paulo Roma.
>
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/attachments/20060814/2b2afaa1/attachment.html