[ATrpms-devel] kernel 2.6.17-1.2174_FC5smp

[Paulo Cavalcanti]

On 8/13/06, Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> wrote:
>
> On Sun, Aug 13, 2006 at 06:54:39PM -0300, Paulo Cavalcanti wrote:
> > I have just upgraded my kernel. Your new yum plugin downloaded all
> > the modules and everything has been installed. It is a success, I
> > checked, and the versions are correct.
>
> Thanks!
>
> > However, nvidia driver did not load. So, I had to recompile  it and
> reboot
> > again.
>
> Do you have multiple nvidia driver versions installed? If they get
> updated there may be a mismatch and you need to use
> nvidia-graphics-switch.
>
> > Maybe you should check nividia driver again:
> >
> >
> nvidia-graphics8762-kmdl-2.6.17-1.2174_FC5smp-1.0_8762-74.fc5.at.i686.rpm
>
> The recompilation you did was it on the same src.rpm as the one above?


Yes it is. I have just downloaded the source. Although I have multiple
nvidia drivers, all of them are 8762. This is because I have at least 4
kernels installed. Just check, please. I may be wrong.

> But why smart for Fedora 5 does not use all the channels? Mine, only
> > lists atrpms, extras, fedoralegacyupdates, release, rpm-db and
> > updates.
>
> There is no difference in smart/yum wrt channels. If you only install
> atrpms-package-config you get the above. If you add
> medley-package-config you get a lot more, but always for both
> depsolvers (or better said for all three including apt).
>
> > On the other hand, fedora 4 lists all of the channels.
>
> You probably have medley-package-config for FC4 installed, but not for
> FC5.


No. I have only

medley-package-config-109-3.fc5.at.i386.rpm

This has been this way since I installed FC5. But since I am not an expert
in smart, I thought I forgot to do any configuration.

I did a clean fedora 5 installation, using redhat CDs, and a brand new SATA
hd.
I created the image for the other computers from this installation.

> And second, why does synaptic change the name of the packages?  It
> > replaces some - for _ in the rpm name.
>
> Beats me, can you give an example?


Let me see If I remenber. I have a script to fix the names. I thing that

alsaplayer-0.99.76-2.rhfc5.ccrma.i386.rpm

is saved as:

alsaplayer_0.99.76-2.rhfc5.ccrma_i386.rpm. This has always been this way,
even for older versions. Generally, I used synapitic only for CCRMA. But
they support yum now.

Fedora is running rosegarden with jack very well. The only problem
is the kernel .... Not real time ...

But, even band-in-a-box can be used via wine. So, I think the day I will
dump windows forever is very close. As you can see, I am a frustrated
musician.


> I upgraded yum for fedora 4 to 2.6.1. It works great. I use your plugin,
> > protectbase, etc...
> > Do you intend to do the same thing for ATrpms? I am not saying people
> should
> > use fedora 4.
>
> You mean upgrading yum to 2.6.1?


Yes. For fedora 4.

/Paulo Roma.
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/attachments/20060813/67bb6765/attachment.html