[ATrpms-devel] Re: Changing foo-kmdl- to kernel-module-foo-? (was: Blackmailing ...)

[Axel Thimm]

On Thu, May 06, 2004 at 04:09:28PM +0200, Chris Rouch wrote:
> [I've sent this as private mail - if you want it to go to the list as
> well, that's up to you]

OK, done so, otherwise your shouts will not be heard ;)

> Here's my shout: Change to kernel-module-foo. As an end user it is more
> important to me that the different repos work together than current
> naming schemes are preserved.
> 
> And Axel - I know this issue has really pissed you off, and I'm not in a
> position to judge who is right or wrong (nor do I want to), but I think
> using emotive subject lines and arguments does not advance your cause.
> If you and Dag want to fight in private emails then that's obviously up
> to you, but throwing your toys around in public makes you both seem
> lesser people. 

Indeed.

> I know for sure that you and Dag have both saved me lots of work by
> producing rpms that I'd otherwise have to do myself, and I'm very
> grateful for that. I'd hate for the rift between you to become
> permanent.

You are only seeing the top of the iceberg. The rift is already almost
a year old I guess. I don't know why, but Dag has been torpedoing me
and ATrpms whenever possible.

I am only throwing my toys because this has frustrated me so long in
private mails with Dag (which don't look different). I guess I should
collect them and go play elsewhere ;)
-- 
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/attachments/20040506/387e7066/attachment.bin