[ATrpms-devel] Re: Restructuring kernel specfiles for allowing custom kernel rpms and end-user kmdl (re)packaging

[Ed Avis]

Axel Thimm <Axel.Thimm at atrpms.net> writes:

>>Why not just make an atrpms-macros rpm that contains the macros?
>
>OK.

And then BuildRequires: atrpm-macros, assuming that rpm is clever
enough to check the BuildRequires before complaining about undefined
thingummies.

-- 
Ed Avis <ed at membled.com>