[ATrpms-devel] Canonical names/device ids for further lirc
instances.
Axel Thimm
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
Tue Aug 3 09:53:44 CEST 2004
Hi,
for some applications there are more than one lirc instance needed
(e.g. receive & transmit, multiple remotes etc.). I know there are
about 100 well written recipes for doing so, but if it will be
packaged it should be using the developers' suggested approach.
What device/daemon names should be used and what additional device
ids? Would it be a good time to standardize this? What is the
developers' best recipe to create N lirc instances, of which some of
them are used for transmitting, or more generally having N1 lirc
receiving instances and N2 lirc transmitting instances.
And finally: Is there any chance that lirc would be doing this out of
the box sometime in the near future? :)
Thanks!
--
Axel.Thimm at ATrpms.net
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: not available
Url : http://lists.atrpms.net/pipermail/atrpms-devel/attachments/20040803/9fd00fd6/attachment.bin
More information about the atrpms-devel
mailing list